Dr. Alisher Agzamov MD PhD
When a hospital patient goes into
cardiac arrest, one of the most difficult questions facing the medical team is
how long to continue cardiopulmonary
resuscitation.
Now a new study involving hundreds of
hospitals suggests that many doctors may be giving up too soon.
The study found that patients have a
better chance of surviving in hospitals that persist with CPR for just nine
minutes longer, on average, than hospitals where efforts are halted earlier.
There are no clear, evidence-based
guidelines for how long to continue CPR efforts.
The findings challenge conventional
medical thinking, which holds that prolonged resuscitation for hospitalized
patients is usually futile because when patients do survive, they often suffer
permanent neurological damage. To the contrary, the researchers found that
patients who survived prolonged CPR and left the hospital fared as well as
those who were quickly resuscitated.
The study, published online 04.09.2012
in The
Lancet,
is one of the largest of its kind and one of the first to link the duration of
CPR efforts with survival rates. It should prompt hospitals to review their
practices and consider changes if their resuscitation efforts fall short,
several experts said.
Between one and five of every 1,000
hospitalized patients suffer a cardiac arrest. Generally they are older and
sicker than non-hospitalized patients who suffer cardiac arrest, and their
outcomes are generally poor, with fewer than 20 percent surviving to be
discharged from the hospital.
“One of the challenges we face during
an in-hospital cardiac arrest is determining how long to continue resuscitation
if a patient remains unresponsive,” said Dr. Zachary D. Goldberger, the lead
author of the new study, which was financed by the American Hospital
Association, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. “This is one
area in which there are no guidelines.”
Dr. Goldberger and his colleagues
gathered data from the world’s largest registry of in-hospital cardiac arrest,
maintained by the American Heart Association, identifying 64,339 patients who
went into cardiac arrest at 435 hospitals in the United States from 2000 to
2008.
The researchers examined adult
hospital patients in regular beds or intensive care units, excluding patients
in the emergency room and those who suffered arrest during procedures. They
calculated the median duration of resuscitation efforts for the nonsurvivors
rather than the survivors, in order to measure a hospital’s tendency to engage
in more prolonged resuscitation efforts.
One of the first surprises was the
significant variation in duration of CPR among the hospitals, ranging from a
median of 16 minutes in hospitals spending the least amount of time trying to
revive patients to a median of 25 minutes among those spending the most — a
difference of more than 50 percent.
The researchers initially thought they
would find that some patients were being subjected to protracted resuscitation
efforts in vain, said the senior author, Dr. Brahmajee Nallamothu, professor at
the University of Michigan and a cardiologist at the Ann Arbor VA Medical
Center.
But as it turned out, those extra
minutes made a positive difference. Patients in hospitals with the longest CPR
efforts were 12 % more likely to survive and go home from the hospital than
those with the shortest times.
Dr. Nallamothu and his colleagues
found that neurological function was similar, regardless of the duration of
CPR.
The patients who got the most added
benefit from prolonged CPR were those whose conditions do not respond to defibrillation, or being
shocked. The extra time spent on prolonged CPR may give doctors time to analyze
the situation and try different interventions, they said.
“You can keep circulating blood and
oxygen using CPR for sometimes well over 30 minutes and still end up with
patients who survive and, importantly, have good neurological survival,” said
Dr. Jerry P. Nolan, a consultant in anesthesia and critical
care medicine at Royal United Hospital NHS Trust in Bath, England, who wrote a
commentary accompanying the article.
Dr. Stephen J. Green, associate
chairman of cardiology at North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, who was
not involved in the study, said hospitals might have to modify their practices
in light of the new research.
“You don’t want to be on the low end
of this curve,” Dr. Green said. “Hospitals that are outliers should reassess
what they’re doing and think about extending the duration of their CPR.”
Still, he and other experts worried
that the new findings could lead to protracted efforts to resuscitate patients
for whom it is inappropriate because they are at the end of their lives or for
other reasons.
“There isn’t going to be a magic
number,” Dr. Green said. “If you’re in there 10 to 15 minutes, you need to push
higher, but as you get up higher and higher, you get to the point of very
little return.”
The study authors acknowledge that
their research does not indicate that longer CPR is better for every patient.
“The last thing we want is for the
take-home message to be that everyone should have a long resuscitation,” Dr.
Goldberger said. “We’re not able to identify an optimal duration for all
patients in the hospital.”
No comments:
Post a Comment